1. First Section:

Advisory Body of Budge Budge Institute of Technology

The Advisory Body of Budge Budge Institute of Technology (BBIT) consists of distinguished professionals and academicians dedicated to guiding the institution towards excellence in technical education. Their collective expertise spans various domains, ensuring that BBIT remains at the forefront of higher education.

1. Prof. (Dr.) Rupendranth Chakrabarti
   With a vision for a promising future for students, Dr. Chakrabarti highlights BBIT’s steady growth as an engineering and management institute. He emphasizes the commitment of the management to create a strong center for technical education.
   Qualifications: M.Tech (CU), M.E. (JU), Ph.D. (JU)
   Background: Former HOD, EE Dept., Jadavpur University; Former Chairman of Placement Committee, Jadavpur University.
2. Prof. (Dr.) Sanjoy Mukherjee
   An educator with over two decades of international experience, Dr. Mukherjee recognizes BBIT as a comprehensive platform for higher education in India. He believes that graduates will find themselves well-prepared for challenging careers in the corporate sector.
   Qualifications: MBA (IIMC), Ph.D. (JU)
   Background: Professor, IIM Shillong; Former Professor, IIM Calcutta; Nominated for Aspen Scholar.
3. Dr. Balram Gupta
   Dr. Gupta commends BBIT for its role in disseminating technological knowledge aligned with global engineering needs. He notes that the pedagogy and academic standards at BBIT are comparable to those in the USA.
   Qualifications: M.B.B.S., M.D. (New York University, USA)
   Background: Diplomate of American Board of Internal Medicine; Former Consultant Physician, Trinity Medical Center, USA.
4. Mr. Indrajit De
   Mr. De expresses admiration for BBIT’s offerings, stating that its courses rival those of nationally recognized institutions like IIT and IIM, as well as esteemed global institutes. He emphasizes that BBIT’s infrastructure is comparable to leading institutions worldwide.
   Qualifications: MBA and MS from University of Virginia, USA
   Background: Former Consultant, Financial Services Practice at Deloitte Consulting.
5. Mr. Joydeep Bhattacharya
   Mr. Bhattacharya views BBIT as a unique institution catering to the higher education needs of the corporate world. He refers to BBIT as a global hub akin to IITs and IIMs.
   Qualifications: MBA, Indian Institute of Management, Bangalore
   Background: Former Vice-President – Research & Analysis in the Knowledge Services Group of Wipro.

The Advisory Body plays a crucial role in shaping the strategic direction of BBIT, ensuring that the institute continues to meet the evolving demands of the education sector and the industry.

2. Second Section – will open in a new Link

Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC)

The Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC) at Budge Budge Institute of Technology (BBIT) plays a pivotal role in ensuring and maintaining the quality standards of academic and administrative activities within the institution. Established as a mechanism to drive continuous improvement, the IQAC is dedicated to fostering a culture of quality through strategic initiatives, effective planning, and consistent performance evaluations.

The IQAC promotes innovative teaching practices, ensures equitable access to education, and builds a robust framework for institutional excellence. It also facilitates the integration of modern methodologies in teaching, learning, and evaluation, ensuring that BBIT stays competitive and meets the evolving needs of students and stakeholders.

With a focus on feedback, documentation, and the dissemination of best practices, the IQAC strives to uphold the highest standards of education and institutional operations, thus contributing to the institution’s overall growth and development.

Key Functions:

• Developing and implementing quality benchmarks across academic and administrative activities.
• Promoting a learner-centric environment that fosters faculty development and participatory teaching.
• Coordinating workshops, seminars, and feedback mechanisms to enhance the institutional quality culture.
• Preparing the Annual Quality Assurance Report (AQAR) for submission to NAAC.
• Through these efforts, IQAC ensures that BBIT remains focused on its mission of delivering high-quality education and evolving as a leading institution in technical and management education.

Know More – Box and will be interlinked to (https://sites.google.com/bbit.edu.in/bbitiqaccell/home?pli=1&authuser=5)

3. Third Section:

NAAC Re – DVV – ((All Names here are rephrased – kindly check website for downloadable files)

• The number of programs offered by the institution, listed year-wise for the past five years.
• The count of full-time teachers in the institution, detailed year-wise for the last five years.
• The total number of classrooms and seminar halls available within the institution.
• The institution’s total number of computers.
• Faculty members of the institution participate in various university activities.
• Courses offered by the institution that incorporate experiential learning, including project work, fieldwork, and internships.
• The institution gathers feedback on the syllabus and its delivery from students, teachers, employers, and alumni.
• The feedback process at the institution is categorized and managed efficiently.
• The total number of students enrolled in the institution over the last five years.
• The number of seats filled under reserved categories (SC, ST, OBC, Divyangjan, etc.) in accordance with the applicable reservation policies.
• The ratio of mentors to students for academic and other related matters during the most recent academic year.
• The years of teaching experience of full-time teachers at the institution during the latest completed academic year.
• Grants received from government and non-government agencies for research projects or endowments in the institution, measured in INR Lakhs.
• The number of departments that had research projects funded by government and non-government agencies in the last year.
• The number of workshops and seminars held on research methodology, intellectual property rights, and entrepreneurship.
• The number of Ph.D. candidates registered per eligible faculty member over the last five years.
• The number of research papers published by faculty members in UGC-approved journals over the last five years.
• The number of books, chapters, and papers published by faculty in national or international conference proceedings during the year.
• The number of classrooms and seminar halls equipped with ICT-enabled facilities, such as smart classes and learning management systems (LMS).
• The total expenditure on infrastructure development, excluding faculty salaries, for the year.
• The institution’s subscription to various e-resources, including e-journals, e-books, databases, and remote access to resources.
• Expenditure on the purchase of books, e-books, and journal subscriptions over the last five years, measured in INR Lakhs.
• The number of teachers and students using the library daily, including data on physical visits and online access.
• Expenditure on the maintenance of infrastructure, both physical and academic support facilities, excluding the salary component.
• The number of students who benefited from scholarships and financial aid provided by the institution or non-government agencies over the last five years.
• The institution has established a transparent mechanism for addressing student grievances, including cases related to sexual harassment and ragging, and ensures prompt resolution.
• The number of students who advanced to higher education in the given year.
• The number of sports and cultural events in which students participated over the past five years, either organized by the institution or other institutions.
• The number of professional development and administrative training programs organized by the institution for its teaching and non-teaching staff.
• Funds or grants received from non-governmental bodies, individuals, or philanthropists over the past five years (excluding funds covered in Criterion III).
• The quality assurance initiatives undertaken by the institution.
• The institution’s facilities for alternative energy sources and measures for energy conservation.
• Initiatives undertaken by the institution to create a green campus environment.
• Regular audits of the institution’s environmental and energy practices, along with any awards received for its green campus initiatives.
• The institution ensures a barrier-free, disabled-friendly environment for its students and staff.

4. Fourth Section

Key Documents: (All Names here are rephrased – kindly check website for downloadable files)

• Institution Strategic Perspective Plan and Goals
• Welfare Measures for Teaching and Non-Teaching Staff
• Institutional HR Policies
• Annual Report 2020-2021
• Audited Financial Statement of JGFT (31st March, 2021)
• Faculty List for the Session 2016-2017
• Faculty List for the Session 2017-2018
• Faculty List for the Session 2018-2019
• Faculty List for the Session 2019-2020
• Faculty List for the Session 2020-2021
• Average Percentage of Teachers Provided Financial Support
• Institutional Strategies for Fund Mobilization and Resource Utilization
• Alternative Energy Sources and Energy Conservation Measures
• Facilities for Management of Degradable and Non-Degradable Waste
• Water Conservation Facilities Available at the Institution
• Green Campus Initiatives
• Disabled-Friendly and Barrier-Free Environment
• Institutional Efforts for an Inclusive Environment
• Celebration of National and International Commemorative Days and Events
• Code of Conduct
• Composition of Code of Conduct Committee
• Feedback Analysis of Stakeholders

5. Fifth Section:

Mandatory Documents: https://www.bbit.edu.in/assets/pdf/Institute_Mandatory_disclosure_2021.pdf

6. Sixth Section:

NAAC Appeal:

The NAAC (National Assessment and Accreditation Council) appeal process is designed to facilitate higher educational institutions in presenting their achievements and adherence to quality standards in various aspects of education, administration, and institutional management. By submitting detailed documentation in key criteria such as curricular aspects, infrastructure, research initiatives, and student support, the institution demonstrates its commitment to continuous improvement, transparency, and academic excellence. Through this structured approach, the institution can effectively communicate its efforts toward fostering a quality-driven, inclusive, and innovative learning environment.

• Curricular Aspects: The institution’s curriculum is well-structured and regularly updated to ensure the relevance and enhancement of academic programs.
• Teaching-Learning and Evaluation: The teaching-learning processes, along with evaluation strategies, are systematically designed to encourage academic growth and comprehensive assessments.
• Research, Innovations, and Extension: The institution actively engages in research activities, fostering innovation and extension programs that contribute to societal growth.
• Infrastructure and Learning Resources: State-of-the-art infrastructure and learning resources are maintained to support effective teaching and learning processes.
• Student Support and Progression: A wide range of student support services is offered to enhance their academic journey and facilitate smooth progression.
• Governance, Leadership, and Management: The institution’s governance model ensures effective leadership and management to achieve strategic objectives and foster a positive organizational culture.
• Institutional Values and Best Practices: The institution is committed to upholding core values and implementing best practices that contribute to sustainable and ethical academic development.
• Number of Programs Offered Year-Wise for the Last Five Years: The institution offers a variety of academic programs that have been increasing in number over the last five years.
• Number of Full-Time Teachers Year-Wise for the Last Five Years: The number of full-time teachers has been consistently maintained and enhanced over the past five years to meet academic needs.
• Number of Computers
  • Data prior to DVV Recommendation: 918
  • Data post-DVV Recommendation: 408

Rest of the Content: https://www.bbit.edu.in/pages/naac-appeal

7. Seventh Section:

NIRF

The National Institutional Ranking Framework (NIRF) is an initiative by the Government of India to rank higher education institutions based on various parameters such as teaching, learning, and resources; research and professional practices; outreach and inclusivity; and perception. The NIRF aims to promote transparency and encourage institutions to enhance their quality of education and research. By evaluating institutions across disciplines—Engineering, Management, and Overall—NIRF provides valuable insights for students, parents, and stakeholders to make informed choices about higher education in India.

https://www.bbit.edu.in/pages/nirf

8. Eight Section:

Self-Assessment Report (SAR)

The Self-Assessment Report (SAR) for the B.Tech. in Mechanical Engineering at Budge Budge Institute of Technology serves as a comprehensive evaluation of the program’s effectiveness and quality. This report is prepared as part of the accreditation process with the National Board of Accreditation (NBA) to ensure that the program meets the highest educational standards.

The SAR details the curriculum structure, faculty qualifications, infrastructure, research initiatives, and student support systems. It highlights the institute’s commitment to continuous improvement and excellence in engineering education, showcasing how the Mechanical Engineering program aligns with industry requirements and fosters student development. By submitting this report, BBIT aims to demonstrate its dedication to providing a robust learning environment that prepares graduates for successful careers in the mechanical engineering field.

https://www.bbit.edu.in/assets/upload/417914_sar-me-dept.pdf